Why must Web3 projects be included in RootData?
Recently, there are several phenomena in the crypto industry worth noting: multiple mainstream exchanges have successively announced the delisting of tokens, including some previously popular projects; at the same time, a survey we conducted shows that nearly 90% of decision-makers at exchanges use third-party data platforms for project evaluation.
These phenomena reflect that project teams are facing some practical challenges in information disclosure. Today, we would like to sincerely discuss what kind of solutions being included in RootData can provide for these challenges.
What pain points do project teams face in information disclosure?
1. Pressure from the community and investors
When users or investors want to learn about a project, they usually check: Is the team background clear? Is the financing information verifiable? Are there updates to the product roadmap? Is the project still actively operating?
If this information is scattered across official websites, Twitter, Discord, and various media, and is not updated in a timely manner, it can easily be misunderstood as "the project has stagnated" or "the team is not transparent." More troubling is that some third-party platforms may have included incorrect information, and the project team may not know how to correct it, leading to a distorted perception of the project.
A real situation is: In the Web3 field, the speed of information dissemination is fast, and false information can easily proliferate. We often encounter feedback from project teams that due to untimely information disclosure or misinformation, various false speculations have emerged in the community, and they ultimately have to contact us, hoping to use RootData's official inclusion to endorse the real information. This not only consumes the energy of the project team but may also affect the judgment of potential investors.
2. Hidden barriers from the exchange listing process
Decision-makers at exchanges evaluate a large number of projects daily, and information overload is the norm. According to RootData's survey of 313 exchange practitioners:
88.9% of respondents refer to RootData's data when evaluating listings.
91.4% believe that being included in authoritative data platforms with detailed information can significantly improve review efficiency.
50% indicate that a lack of transparency in project data will prolong the review time, and 16.7% may even stop the review or reject it outright.
This means that when project information is missing or delayed on mainstream data platforms, the listing process may be inadvertently prolonged, or even miss opportunities. It's not that the project is bad, but that the information has not efficiently reached decision-makers.
3. Compliance pressure from the exchange delisting process
Since 2026, exchanges such as Binance, Coinbase, and OKX have successively delisted a batch of tokens, including some previously popular tokens like LRC, FORTH, NTRN, and RDNT. (Article reference: What characteristics do projects delisted by mainstream exchanges have?)
Although the reasons for each project's delisting vary, observing the delisted projects reveals some commonalities: some projects have incomplete information disclosure, inactive team communication, and insufficient community momentum.
According to RootData's transparency score, most of the delisted projects have a transparency score below 70%. Exchanges have explicitly included "public communication by the project team, community participation, and transparency levels" as part of the token health assessment criteria. When information is not updated for a long time and the team is invisible, the project is easily labeled as a "zombie" and becomes a target for delisting.
This is not RootData's standard, but an inevitable choice for exchanges to protect users and reduce compliance risks as the industry matures.
Why is being included in RootData a solution?
1. Turning "scattered information" into "verifiable structured data"
What RootData brings is not just "reach," but a structured expression of trust.
In the Web3 industry, information itself is not scarce; what is scarce is "information that can be quickly verified."
Who is the team, where does the money come from, how is the token designed—these are questions every investor and exchange will ask, but few have the time to verify each one.
What RootData does is organize this scattered information into a standardized data interface that can be directly used. It will conduct basic information verification and structured organization for each included project, including: team background; financing records; basic project information; token and ecosystem data.
Being included in RootData typically means: the project has basic information transparency, the project has verifiable public data, and the project has industry research value.
2. Entering the information gateway for "investor decision-making"
Many project teams view RootData as an "information display platform," but it is more like a gateway node for industry information flow.
Whether investment institutions are screening projects, exchanges are evaluating listings, or media are writing research content, they will prioritize relying on a few structured data sources to quickly establish understanding. RootData is precisely in this position, currently accumulating over 2 million users, making it an important tool for Web3 practitioners, investors, and researchers to query project information.
The key here is not whether there is a display page, but whether your project information has entered the default information sources for these decision-making scenarios. Once included, the project is no longer just "passively waiting to be searched," but begins to appear in places where others will look when making judgments.
Conversely, if project information is missing or incorrect on RootData, it sets a barrier at the first point of contact for users reaching the project.
3. From "inefficient maintenance in multiple places" to "one update reaching 200+ platforms"
Furthermore, the value of RootData is not just about "being seen." Its more fundamental role is as a source of a data distribution network.
Currently, RootData's API network has connected with over 200 partners, including:
Wallets: Binance Wallet, OKX Wallet, Gate, Token Pocket
Exchanges and data platforms: Coinglass, Magna
Ecosystem institutions: Ethereum Foundation
Security institutions: CertiK
Financial institutions: Amber Group, CMT Digital
This means that when project teams update team information, financing, or key progress in the backend, this information will not just stay on one page, but has the opportunity to synchronize into the internal data systems of multiple products.
In other words, in the past, project teams needed to repeatedly maintain information across different platforms; now it has changed to: one update enters the data flow of multiple platforms, fundamentally changing not just the quantity of exposure, but the "path structure" of information dissemination.
What other values are there after being included in RootData?
1. Establishing a unified, authoritative information gateway
Recently, RootData officially launched the "Project Information Management System," allowing project teams to claim their project homepage through the official email and obtain official identity identification. (Article reference: One-click to settle in RootData, accurately presenting project information on Binance Wallet, Gate, TP, and over 200 platforms)
From now on, all core information (team background, financing records, token economics, roadmap, major events) can be centrally managed in one backend, ensuring that the information displayed externally is accurate and consistent.
Project teams can apply for inclusion at the first opportunity, actively manage their information pages, and no longer need to worry about inconsistencies in information across different platforms, nor repeatedly explain to investors and community members "which information is correct."
2. Improving transparency scores and gaining trust endorsement
RootData has launched the industry's first "transparency score" system, which comprehensively evaluates teams, financing, token economics, key events, and the completeness of basic information, divided into five levels from A to F. This score is being used by investment institutions and exchanges as one of the reference indicators for quickly assessing projects.
Actively managing information and filling in missing content can quickly improve transparency scores. Currently, over 150 projects, including Chainlink, USD.ai, and Cysic, have completed claims and updates, rapidly raising their scores to A level. A high score is not only a recognition but also an intuitive way to demonstrate project credibility to institutions.
3. Entering the industry data dissemination network, amplifying long-term influence
RootData's data is not only used internally on the platform but is also widely cited in investment institution research reports, data platform industry statistics, and in-depth reports by industry media.
This means that when you update financing news, adjust token economic models, or announce mainnet launches on RootData, this information has the opportunity to appear in broader industry content, being continuously cited and disseminated. As the transparency score system is adopted by more institutions, every change in your score may become a reference for industry research and media reports.
In the long run, project data will no longer just be an "information page," but an asset that continues to generate influence in the industry.
How to settle in?
The settlement process is simple: enter the RootData project inclusion page, complete the information filling and submission. (Inclusion entry: https://cn.rootdata.com/Projects/submit?ft=create)
We understand that project teams already have many things to handle daily: development, operations, financing, community maintenance... Maintaining a data platform seems to be a "non-urgent" matter. But we also see that more and more project teams are beginning to actively claim and manage their RootData information, and the reason is simple: it can indeed help them reduce communication costs and increase the chances of being seen and trusted.
RootData does not define "good projects," nor does it make value judgments. We simply provide a tool to make information dissemination more efficient and transparent. If you hope that your project information can be presented more accurately to the community, investors, and exchanges, you are welcome to settle in RootData.
You may also like

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight
Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.




