SIREN, another leveraged scam
$SIREN, the token that launched on Binance Alpha and contracts during the "broccoli" era, which was speculated to be CZ's dog's name, has almost been forgotten.
However, just two days ago, when the whole internet was discussing its "surge," the total liquidation volume of this coin was only second to Bitcoin, ETH, and XAU, ranking fourth with about $23.25 million. If it weren't for Trump raising the volatility of gold again with TACO, SIREN would have been third.
The price of this coin once approached $5, corresponding to a market cap of about $3.675 billion, briefly squeezing into the top 30 of the total cryptocurrency market cap, surpassing established tokens like OKB and UNI.
In a sluggish market, this is not the first time we have seen such a phenomenon. $PIPPIN, $RIVER, $BEAT, $MYX... By sorting through the relevant questions about $SIREN, what kind of experience can we gain from these similar situations?
Is there a traceable "leverage scam"?
As early as March 5, @c_ckoko tweeted, "The $SIREN is clearly absolutely controlled, this is a way to harvest users across exchanges."
His tweet explained well how this "leverage scam" operates: the depth difference in the spot market of trading platforms can create significant volatility with a small amount of capital, affecting the price of Binance contracts for harvesting.
Moreover, as he suggested at the end of his tweet, the $SIREN contract price index was adjusted. At the time he tweeted, the influence on the $SIREN Binance contract price index was 50% from Gate spot, 12.5% from Kucoin spot, 12.5% from Binance contracts, and 25% from Binance Alpha. After two adjustments, the current contract price index proportions are 25% from Gate spot, 12.5% from Kucoin spot, 12.5% from Binance contracts, and 50% from Binance Alpha.
According to Arkham data, the $SIREN inventory on Gate was only 64,000 pieces on March 22.
In this case, a trading volume of $100,000 can create a minute candlestick with nearly 40% volatility.
From the perspective of open interest, $SIREN showed significant anomalies starting from February 8, with open interest that had long hovered around $3-5 million suddenly surging to $58.83 million.
Of course, abnormal signs do not necessarily lead to a specific inevitable result. After all, the chips are in the hands of the controlling dealer, and we cannot determine how the dealer will harvest.
Methods
First is the control of chips, hoarding a large amount of spot chips, and opening large long positions to push the price high.
On-chain analyst Ember (@EmberCN) aggregated the control situation of $SIREN and found that up to 88.5% of $SIREN is controlled by the dealer based on on-chain data. If we include the portion deposited by the dealer in CEX, this number would be even higher.
The above tweet also pointed out that DWF Labs might be the controller of this event, but DWF Labs co-founder Zac denied this claim in the group chat.
After pushing up the price, the dealer induces shorts and reverses to lay down short positions, making retail investors feel that the top of the phase is approaching.
From the fee rate chart above, we can see that starting from March 14, $SIREN frequently experienced high negative fee rates, with shorts continuously sending money to the dealer's long positions, which the dealer then used to further push up the price. In the early hours of March 23, Gate spot experienced a drastic fluctuation of 78% within 10 minutes, corresponding to a trading volume of only about $450,000, with $SIREN's price rising from $2.75 to nearly $5. This means that many people were liquidated.
At this point, $SIREN may not be over yet, because looking at it from a rigid perspective, the dealer can still close long positions and dump the spot, creating a crazy large bearish candlestick, and then close the short positions at a cost far lower than the opening of the shorts. By comparing the trends of $RIVER, $POWER, and $BEAT with $SIREN in one chart, it seems that $SIREN is still missing a final netting.
As this article is about to be published, the above speculation has been confirmed:
Conclusion
Regardless of whether the current market is depressed, the emergence of such harvesting schemes is always bad. Indeed, some trading experts can sip a bowl of soup from the dealer amidst the fog of information, but for the vast majority of retail investors, it is just a gamble with no fairness.
When such an obvious harvesting scheme briefly appeared in the top 30 of the cryptocurrency market cap, I can only sigh.
You may also like

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market
Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
